How much of a small file problem do we have...

Here at the Tier1 at RAL-LCG2; we have been draining disk servers with a fury (achieving over 800MB/s on a 10G NIC machine.) Well we get that rate on some servers with large files;  but machines with small files achieve a lower rate, but how many small files do we have and is there a VO dependency... So I decided to look at our three largest LCG VOs.
In tabula form; here is the analysis so far:

VO  LHCb CMS ATLAS ATLAS ATLAS sub section All All All non-Log files Log files # Files 16305 14717 396887 181799 215088 Size (TB) 37.565 39.599 37.564 35.501 2.062 # Files >  10 GB 1 24 75 75 0 # Files >     1GB 8526 11902 9683 9657 26 # Files < 100MB 4434 2330 3E+06 134137 3E+06 # Files <  10MB 2200 569 265464 68792 196672 # Files <    1MB 1429 294 85190 20587 64603 # Files <  100kB 243 91 6693 2124 4569 # Files <    10kB 6 13 635 156 479 Ave Filesize (GB) 2.30 2.69 0.0946 0.195 0.00959 % space used by files > 1GB 96.71 79.73 64.56

Now what I find interesting is how similar values LHCb and CMS are with each other, even though they are vastly different VOs. What worries me is that over 50% of ATLAS files are less than 10MB. Now just to find a tier2 to do a similar analysis to see if it just a T1 issue.....