Just a quick post regarding how we noticed packet errors on one of a balanced pair of links within our network. By taking the link down (at ~1700 Wednesday) and re-seating the end connections lead to a mark improvement in rate and reduction in packet loss.
Here is a plot of the number of packets on the link:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78a09/78a09e332aa1741cb9c079e9aba5c0856f0f73ed" alt="" |
Packets on the link |
This clearly shows the period with no packets on the link corresponding to when the link was down.
Now look at the packet errors and discards:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27cd7/27cd7e7c7dd2a95b685fb2dc883c43dcd3223848" alt="" |
Error/Discards on the link |
This clearly shows packet errors/discards before the change; and none after the change. The packet "loss" rate was ~ 6k/240k or ~14k/560k which equates to ~2.5 %!!The really interest comes when looking at the data rate through the combined link during this period:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16376/163760bfb42a9eca3955bb6df6b1ce5dee47475f" alt="" |
Rate |
The data rate through the link pair increases by ~10x when the link is removed (form ~0.6Gbps to 6Gbps.) Also note that there is no dramatic loss when the secondary link is re-nabled (at ~1130 on Thursday.)
No comments:
Post a Comment