06 March 2019

Rucio 2nd Community Workshop roundup

There was an interesting workshop for members of the rucio community last week:

Here is the summary from the workshop:
● Presentation from 25 communities, 66 attendees!
● Many different use-cases have been presented
○ Please join us on Slack and the rucio-users mailing list for follow-ups!
● Documentation!
○ Examples
○ Operations documentation
○ Easy way for communities to contribute to the documentation
○ Documentation/Support on Monitoring (Setup, Interpretation, Knowledge)
○ Recommendations on data layout/scheme → Very difficult decision for new communities
● Databases
○ Larger-Scale evaluation of non-Oracle databases would be very beneficial for the community
● Drop of Python 2.6 support for Rucio clients
● LTS/Gold release model
○ Will propose a release model with LTS/gold releases with Security/Critical bug fixes
● Archive support
● Metadata support
○ Existing metadata features (generic metadata) need more evaluation/support
○ More documentation/examples needed
● Additional authentication methods needed
○ OpenID, Edugain, …
● Interfacing/Integration with DIRAC
○ Many communities interested
○ Possibility for joint effort?

Here is a list of my summary of these and other snippets from the talks I find interesting/thought provoking. I 'll point out I was not at the meeting so tone of talks n=may have been lost on me.

Network talk from GEANT:
Lots of 100Gb links!

DUNE talk:
Replacing SAM ( THE product from where I started my data management journey...)
Unfortunately not able to use significant amount of storage at RAL Echo
– Dynafed WebDAV interface can’t handle files larger than 5GB
– Latest Davix can do direct upload of large files (as a multi-part upload), but not third-party
– Maybe use the S3 interface directly instead?
• Recent work done on improving Rucio S3 URL signing

CMS talk:
Some concerns called out by review panel which we will have to address or solve:
▪ Automated and centralized consistency checking — person is assigned
▪ No verification that files are on tape before they are allowed to be deleted from buffer
★ FTS has agreed to address this

BelleII talk:
My thoughts:
using a BelleII specific version of DIRAC
They are evaluating rucio
naming schema is "interesting"
power users seem a GoodIdea (TM)
BelleII thoughts:
• Looking ahead, the main challenge is achieving balance between conflicting requirements:
• bringing Rucio into Belle II operations quickly enough to avoid duplication of development effort
• supporting the old system for a running experiment

FTS talk:
I didn't know about multi hop support:
Multi-hop transfers support – Transfers from A->C, but also A->B->C

XENONnT talk:
This is a dark matter experiment with some familiar  HEP sites using rucio.

ICE cube experiment :
Interesting data movement issues when base a south pole!
●Raw data is ~1 TB/day, sent via cargo ship; 1 shipment/year
●Filtered data is ~80 GB/day, sent via satellite; daily transfer

CTA talk:
CTA is an experiment for cosmic rays as well as CERN's news tape system!

Rucio DB at CERN  talk:
rucio DB numbers for ATLAS are "impressive" (1014M DIDs)

SKA talk:
RAL members get a thank you specifically.

NSLSII talk:
Similar needs as Diamond Light source DLS , possible collaboration?
Another site which does both HEP and photonics.
Has tested using globus endpoints.

XDC talk:
rucio and dynafed and storage all in one!

CTA (tape system) talk:
Initial deployments: predict a need of 70PB of disk pace just in the disk cache ! (am I reading this slide correctly?)

LCLSII talk:
Linear version of NSLSII based at SLAC, similar to BNL> need to use FTS to be tested. prod system need in the next year.

LSST talk:
Using docker release of rucio
Nice set of setup tests. Things look promising!
– FTS has proven its efficiency for data transfers, either standalone or paired with Rucio
– Rucio makes data management easier in a multi-site context, and tasks can be highly automated
– These features could prove beneficial to LSST
● Evaluation is still ongoing
– discussions with the LSST DM team at NCSA are taking place

Dynafed talk:
Dynafed as a Storage Element is work in progress
– Not be the design purpose of Dynafed

RAL/IRIS talk:
I would be interested to hear how this tlak went down with th epeople present

ARC at Nordugrid talk:
I still think ARC control tower (ACT)  are the future. rucio integration with volatile rse is nice.

1 comment:

Gulf Movers in Dubai said...

Gulf movers and packers provide Gulf Movers in Dubai and on time Relocation Services in Dubai services with professional 6 years moving Experience. We are best Best Packers and Movers with Local moving services Throughout UAE. Gulf Movers are among the Best Best Moving Companies in Dubai with quick and fast service. We also offer the reliable Movers and Packers in Dubai. For More details you can check our website http://www.gulfexpress.ae/

Gulf Movers and Packers are the best Cheap Movers in Dubai and which gives on time Local Moving Companies services with professional 6 years moving Experience. We are the best Dubai Movers and Packers with Local moving services Throughout UAE. Gulf Movers are among the Best Moving Companies which provides Best International Movers in Dubai services with quick and fast response. We also offer the reliable Storage Companies in Dubai. We are the best Office Relocation Dubai with Local moving services Throughout UAE. For More details you can check our website http://www.gulfexpress.ae/